Search for: "State v. D. A. R."
Results 201 - 220
of 16,102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2023, 6:10 am
Adam Schiff (D-Cal) and Sen. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:41 pm
Javitt & Michael D. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
The rapid speed at which AI capabilities are advancing compels the United States to lead in this moment for the sake of our security, economy, and society. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 12:11 pm
The surge has not only represented a significant problem in the states and communities immediately adjacent to the border, but increasingly in Northern cities as well, including New York. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 9:32 am
Contents include:ArticlesLaurence R. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 6:16 am
[6] Brief of Amici Curiae State of West Virginia and 26 Other States in Support of Petitioners, Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 11:26 am
Mar. 24, 2004); Kathleen R. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:24 pm
Troops, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 11:44 am
State v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 5:50 am
(Of note, a new bipartisan bill introduced in September by Representatives Barbara Lee (D-CA) and Michael Burgess (R-TX), the Drone Reform Act, would achieve this.) [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 8:27 am
” The Second Amendment returns to the Supreme Court Less than two years after their landmark decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm
Under the UCC, as a general rule, all types of goods held on consignment (not just art) are subject to claims of the consignee-dealer’s creditors while in the consignee’s possession unless the consignor has complied with the UCC’s requirements of publicly filing a notice stating that the consignor holds a security interest in the consigned work of art. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 3:51 am
Moreover, the courts have rejected the use of exclusion in Powell v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
In a recent report, Viral V. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 10:12 am
r. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:53 am
State v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:19 am
We believe there is merit in more broadly exploring what the United States can learn from comparative administrative law in general. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am
In Re D [2008] 1 WLR 1499 at [27] Lord Carswell approved what had been said by Richards LJ in R (N) v Mental Health Review Tribunal (Northern Region) [2006] QB 468 at [62] who had said, ‘Although there is a single civil standard of proof on the balance of probabilities, it is flexible in its application. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 1:06 pm
See United States v. [read post]
