Search for: "State v. D. C. F."
Results 201 - 220
of 5,791
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
A brilliant surgeon operates on [C] and is able to save [C]’s life, while [D] dies of his wounds, because his surgeon is competent but less able than [C]’s surgeon. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:22 am
LEXIS 72059 (D. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 10:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 2:30 pm
C., March 6, 2017, J.M. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 6:25 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:16 am
State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 4:19 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 10:42 am
United States v. [read post]
9 May 2009, 12:21 pm
Smith, 531 F.3d 1261, 1266 n. 2 (10th Cir. 2008) (quoting United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:34 am
C 09-03628 SI, 2009 WL 3809816 (N.D. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 7:12 am
Hernandez, 313 F.3d 1206 (9th Cir. 2002), and a privacy interest in the contents, but not the exterior, of the package, United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 1:33 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 11:35 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 6:10 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 7:13 am
LEXIS 17878 at *33; see also United States v Hooker, 418 F Supp 476 (M.D. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 4:52 am
Martin, 411 F.3d 998, 1001 (8th Cir. 2005) (quoting United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 7:51 pm
In United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 10:13 am
§ 9007(b)(3), relying on Souratgar, 818 F.3d at 79, Radu v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 10:13 am
§ 9007(b)(3), relying on Souratgar, 818 F.3d at 79, Radu v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 6:40 am
DOJ (D.D.C.) -- concluding that DEA’s Vaughn indices were adequate and that agency properly withheld records under Exemptions 6, 7(C), 7(D), 7(E), and 7(F), except for its Exemption 7(E) withholdings pertaining to a law enforcement manual. [read post]
