Search for: "State v. D. L. W." Results 201 - 220 of 1,611
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2022, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Arizona 2.59% > $0 2.59% > $0 $12,950 $25,900 n.a. n.a. $100 credit (d, f, g, w, pp) 3.34% > $27,808 3.34% > $55,615             4.17% > $55,615 4.17% > $111,229             4.50% > $166,843 4.50% > $333,684           Arkansas 2.00% > $0 2.00% > $0 $2,200 $4,400 $29 credit $58 credit $29 credit (d, h, i, o, oo) 4.00% > $4,300 4.00% > $4,300    … [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 8:57 pm by Bill Marler
The FDA and state and local regulatory officials traced the romaine lettuce to 23 farms and 36 fields in the Yuma growing region. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 1:03 am by Bill Marler
Atkinson W, Wolfe S, Hamborsky J, McIntyre L, eds. 11th ed. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
No state recognizes such a sweeping right of publicity that it is subject to zero countervailing First Amendment protections. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 9:23 am by Gene Takagi
Notable Events of the Week: “President Biden warned President Vladimir V. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
I'll begin by laying out a few categories of situations where the risk of reputational harm is especially serious, and then summarize the state of court decisions on the subject. [1.] [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 06460 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state (see Opportune N. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 9:25 am by admin
” For example, rather than discuss “[w]orkers who do not use PPE [personal protective equipment” or “people who do not seek healthcare,” the AMA instructs authors, without any apparent embarrassment or shame, to “try” substituting “workers under-resourced with” PPE, or “people with limited access to” healthcare. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
"[W]ithout [a party's] identity in the public record, it is difficult to apply legal principles of res judicata and collateral estoppel"[22]—or to apply judicial estoppel, or to similarly check whether the party's past factual assertions and legal positions are consistent with their current ones.[23] [8.] [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 2:07 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 Claim handlers continue to wrestle with enduring long-tail Exchange Act claims, federal and state Securities Act claims, and shareholder derivative suits without respite. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am by Eugene Volokh
And litigation of course deploys the coercive power of the state, even as it also accomplishes private goals. [read post]