Search for: "State v. Davenport" Results 201 - 220 of 228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2012, 7:03 am by Howard Zimmerle
He has offices in Rock Island and Davenport, and handles cases in Iowa and Illinois. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 12:26 pm
(Ars Technica) Judge rejects woman's request to jury trial, orders her to pay RIAA: Maverick v Harper (Techdirt) US publishers and Google settle copyright litigation over Google Book Search Library Project (The Trademark Blog) (Intellectual Property Watch) (EXCESS COPYRIGHT) (Law360) (Lessig Blog) (Michael Geist) (Out-Law) (EFF) (Public Knowledge) (Ars Technica) (Copyfight) (Techdirt) (Law360) (IPKat) (Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) Hoang v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:54 am by Bexis
  Relying on the rightly-maligned “reasonably calculated” language in current Rule 26(b)(1), the magistrate’s opinion in McLane v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 7:55 pm
Pat Gudridge: Davenport v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:53 pm
The Art of the Family Law and Divorce Objections: Evidence and Procedure in California Family Law Proceedings and RFO Requests By: Michael C. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 4:16 am by Emma Snell
Christian Davenport reports for the Washington Post. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (Patent Circle), Tanzania to conduct study on impact of counterfeit medicines: (Afro-IP), US: New rules on generic biological medicines under US Congressional debate: (Intellectual Property Watch), Pharma & Biotech - Products Acular (Ketorolac) – US: CAFC rules against Apotex reverse doctrine of equivalents: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan, Inc v Apotex: (Patent Circle), Carbatrol (Carbamazapine) – US: Federal judge allows Corepharma to seek DJ that its… [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:39 am
Family Code section 1100 states that "either spouse has the [right of] management and control of the community personal property, ..., as the spouse has of the separate estate of the spouse. [read post]