Search for: "State v. Deans"
Results 201 - 220
of 2,910
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2023, 7:00 am
” Justice Ginsberg, Professor Mary Radford, and Dean Knowles converse after the Miller Lecture. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 4:16 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 1:20 am
The ECtHR Grand Chamber judgment in Fedotova v Russia on the legal recognition of same-sex couples. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 12:32 am
In Howsam v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:27 pm
Loewy’s article Cops, Cars, and Citizens: Fixing the Broken Balance was cited in the following article: Henry Patrick, South Dakota v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 4:54 pm
United States, 157 Fed. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 3:23 pm
The Supreme Court of Kentucky ruled in Britt v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Now former-Dean Ward Farnsworth, who generated the idea and then elicited the willing cooperation of one of the truly most remarkable people in the worldwide legal academy, Richard Albert. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
In Dred Scott v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 9:08 am
Human Rights Due Diligence Laws: From Due Diligence Standards to New Legal Norms (Routledge, forthcoming) Editors:Larry Catá Backer – Pennsylvania State University, W. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee (24… [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee (24… [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 6:42 am
Politicians such as Howard Dean have previously voiced the same view. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 10:00 am
We initiated the State Law Libraries Outreach Project to strengthen ties between the Law Library and state law libraries. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 5:35 pm
As the United States Supreme Court explained long ago in Hudson v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:59 pm
Natalie Orpett sat down with Saraphin Dhanani to discuss United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 8:17 am
From the trial court decision in the case, Davis v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:04 am
The SAFER Act states: “Legislative action is necessary and appropriate to restore the access to the courts that was sharply limited by Gebser v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
Last week’s Supreme Court oral argument in Moore v. [read post]