Search for: "State v. Deeds"
Results 201 - 220
of 2,033
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2017, 10:12 pm
The deed of trust states that Woods became a tenant-at-sufferance when she did not vacate the property after American Homes purchased it. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:08 pm
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 1:08 am
In Beth-El All Nations Church v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 8:21 am
In fact, in the deed of trust, East Olympic also stated that C could convey its interest to B, as long as the transfer is made subject to the promissory note and deed of trust, and did not affect the priority of the deed of trust. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:15 pm
As the secretary of state, Galvin is the state’s register of deeds. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 9:01 pm
(See Estate of Linderme v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 9:01 pm
(See Estate of Linderme v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 9:00 am
In Kerns v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:15 am
In Schneider v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
In Diocese of San Joaquin v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 7:33 am
This post was written by Edward V. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 7:33 am
This post was written by Edward V. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:48 pm
The Piankeshaw Indians had deeded the land twice—once to speculators in 1775, and again, thirty years later, to the United States by treaty. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 4:15 am
The question in Brooke-Willbanks v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 7:24 pm
Then follows an alternative provision that in default of appointment the property shall go unto such person or persons living at the death of the said party of the first part, and being her heir or heirs at law, as would be entitled to take the same by descent from her in case the same was land belonging to her, situate in the state of New York, and, if more than one person, then in the proportion in that behalf prescribed by the laws of said state. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 6:26 pm
Then follows an alternative provision that in default of appointment the property shall go unto such person or persons living at the death of the said party of the first part, and being her heir or heirs at law, as would be entitled to take the same by descent from her in case the same was land belonging to her, situate in the state of New York, and, if more than one person, then in the proportion in that behalf prescribed by the laws of said state. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 9:24 pm
Dixon v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:49 am
The ruling of Office of the Attorney General v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 9:47 am
This issue was challenged in many state courts in the 1970s and 1980s and the clauses were ultimately upheld in Fidelity Federal Savings and Loan Association v. de la Cuesta, 102 S.Ct. 3014, (1982). [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm
Buckley and how civil rights lawyers attacked the state action requirement in Shelley v. [read post]
