Search for: "State v. Dirk" Results 201 - 220 of 291
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2014, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
The case of Deckmyn v Vandersteen (Case C-201/13) on parody considers a set of questions related to the right to freedom of expression conflicting with copyright, and the impact of the Information Society (Infosoc) Directive 2001/29. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 8:58 am by Veronika Gaertner
 Dirk Looschelders: “Continuance or Extinction of Parental Responsibility after a Change of Habitual Residence” Different legal systems provide very different rules for determining the parental responsibility of non-married parents. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 7:43 am by INFORRM
In the Delfi AS v Estonia case the Court held that there had been no violation of Article 10. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 6:21 am by Doug Cornelius
This was the underpinning of an important Supreme Court case thirty years ago – Dirks v SEC – which held that an employee who told a securities analyst about a fraud at the employee’s company had not breached a fiduciary duty to the company (and hence under applicable law the securities analyst could not be prosecuted for insider trading based on this disclosure). [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 3:55 am by David DePaolo
Judge Wu's preliminary injunction in Angelotti Chiropractic v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:31 am
Italy): On Right Outcomes and Wrong Terms Marco Calisto, Jurisdictional Immunities of the State: Germany v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm by Gretchen Goetz
A month before the story went viral, then FSIS spokesman Dirk Fillpot flagged a local news story in an email to other communications staff. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 4:02 am by John L. Welch
TTAB Finds LIkelihood of Confusion but Dismisses Fraud ClaimTest Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Is DIRK for Sunglasses Confusable With DIRK BIKKEMSBERG for Spectacles? [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Tessa Jowell complained to the PCC about an article in the Daily Mail which stated that Jowell had been criticised by the Cabinet Secretary in 2006 over an alleged payment to her husband by Silvio Berlusconi. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The member states are furthermore in a position to balance conflicting rights and interests, such as the right of freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention with the right of property as protected by Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention. [read post]