Search for: "State v. Doherty" Results 201 - 220 of 227
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 4:01 am
Termination by operation of lawMaldarelli v Doherty, 7 A.D.3d 384In some instances a public officer or employee otherwise entitled to a pretermination hearing before he or she may be dismissed is automatically removed from his or her position by operation of law without being given any "notice and hearing. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 3:29 pm
Another case on post-Doherty public law defences was handed down on Friday. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:59 pm
Since then, the Court of Appeal has decided on Doran v Liverpool CC [2009] EWCA Civ 146 (our report) and McGlynn v Welwyn Hatfield BC [2009] EWCA Civ 285 (our report), further shaping the landscape. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:36 pm
In Kay, Lord Brown expressly stated that Connors could been argued as an “unfairness” challenge in the domestic courts and in Doherty, Lord Hope makes clear that the challenges are not confined to Wednesbury grounds. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:55 am
Sanitation worker reinstated as AWOL status due to arrest, acquittal is not misconductSilberzweig v Doherty, ___Misc.3d___Source: Adjunct Law Prof Blog; [lawprofessors.typepad.com]Reproduced with permission. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:35 pm
McGlynn v Welwyn Hatfield District Council [2009] EWCA Civ 285 was an appeal of a summary possession that had been stayed pending Doherty in the Lords. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 4:20 pm
English case law is considered - although not the line of cases from Kay v Lambeth to Doherty. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 4:33 pm
Mr Stilitz for the Secretary of State submitted that the effect of the clarification and modification in Doherty was far more limited. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:55 am
" The term "slip ops" refers to court decisions that may or may not later be published officially in the New York State Reporter. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
What Doherty v Birmingham City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2008] UKHL 57 actually means for a public law defence to possession claims, particularly summary possession, was the subject of London Borough of Hillingdon v Collins & Another [2008] EWHC 3016 (Admin). [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 4:09 pm
  Anyway, on to Ali & Ibrahim v Birmingham City Council [2008] EWCA 1228. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 12:55 pm
The European Court of Human Rights has made clear in Connors v UK (2005) 40 EHRR 9 and McCann v UK (19009/04), that each person faced with eviction proceedings should be able to have a court assess the proportionality of the proposed eviction and, whilst the House of Lords haven’t quite gone as far as this yet, in both Kay v LB Lambeth [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 AC 465 and Doherty v Birmingham CC [2008] UKHL 57, they made clear that the approach… [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 8:35 am
Doherty v Birmingham City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2008] UKHL 57; [2008] WLR (D) 291 “The definition of ‘protected site’ in s 5(1) of the Mobile Homes Act 1983, in excluding gipsies from the protection of the Act, was incompatible with an occupier's right under art 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms to respect for his home. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Oliveira Ardor New York Senior Broker Associate 2 Gina Berger Lower East End Realty Brokerage - Commercial / Investment Sales 2 Ariel Toledano ant propeties inc Brokerage - Residential 3 Michael Xylas Xylas & Ziccardi, LLP Real Estate Attorney 3 Tracy Mehlman Marcus and Millichap Brokerage - Residential 3 David Hale 50 State Building Advisors Executive Vice President 3 Venecia DeSilva upscalecorp@yahoo.com investor 2 John Choi … [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
(Both Jan Luba QC for Doherty and Philip Sales QC for the Secretary of State challenged this point and it was not uniformly accepted - see below). [read post]