Search for: "State v. Downing" Results 201 - 220 of 40,469
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2015, 7:28 am by Yishai Schwartz, Andy Wang
As Wells noted Wednesday, a three-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit handed down an important decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 12:03 pm by Elizabeth Lowman
[JURIST] The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania [official website] on Monday struck down [opinion, PDF] the Congressional Redistricting Act of 2011 [statute] as violating the state constitution. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 5:07 pm by Gerald L. Maatman, Jr.
District Court for the Southern District of Texas granted in part and denied in part the States’ Motion for Summary … Continue reading "Texas Federal Court Shoots Down Executive Order 14,026" [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 8:02 am by Samuel Franklin
[JURIST] The US District Court for the District of Utah [official website] struck down part of Utah's anti-bigamy law [statute, text] on Friday in the case of Brown v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 8:02 am by Samuel Franklin
[JURIST] The US District Court for the District of Utah [official website] struck down part of Utah's anti-bigamy law [statute, text] on Friday in the case of Brown v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
United States that struck down the cap on noneconomic damages in wrongful death cases for many of the same reasons. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 11:48 am by Valerie Sasaki
Earlier today, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 9:22 pm by Norm Pattis
"There is no doubt that Stephen Hayes cut this family down. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am by Peter Groves
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:00 pm by lennyesq
Siding with the petitioner and striking down the Illinois law, the Supreme Court overturned its prior 1977 decision in Abood v. [read post]