Search for: "State v. Dutch" Results 201 - 220 of 1,320
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The first is Okpabi and Ors v Royal Dutch Shell Plc and Anor. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 7:13 am by Xandra Kramer
Hoge Raad 17 juli 2020, ECLI:NL:HR:2020:1280, NIPR 2020, 487 (V Marine Fuels/Dexhon c.s.) / p. 748-759 This article discusses the judgment of the Dutch Supreme Court dated 17 July 2020, ECLI:NL:HR:2020:1280. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor… [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Sophie Corke
A mark must allow consumers to identify the commercial origin of goods and services, which consequently enables future buying decisions, following Sykes v OHIM, Case T‑130/01. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Thursday 28 January, the Supreme Court will hear the case of CPRE Kent v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 2:25 am by Hannah McAslan (UK) and Patty Tan
Netherlands – The Dutch government does not consider it necessary to implement the temporary transition regime for UK investment firms that was proposed previously. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 20 and Thursday 21 January the Supreme Court will hear the case of R (on the application of AB) v Secretary of State for Justice. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:01 am by Chukwuma Okoli
An analysis of the approach taken by courts in the Republic of South Africa” The Roman-Dutch common law of the Republic of South Africa states that a foreign judgment is not directly enforceable there. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor… [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 2:19 pm by Bruce Zagaris
Zagaris and Bannister covered the Dutch Ministry of Culture recommendations for the restitution of stolen cultural property to the former colonies. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 2:19 pm by Bruce Zagaris
Zagaris and Bannister covered the Dutch Ministry of Culture recommendations for the restitution of stolen cultural property to the former colonies. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm by Series of Essays
COVID-19 and Access to Medical Care in the United States May 26, 2020 | Allison K. [read post]
For an outline of the proposition, see the State of California’s voter website. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The second is Robinson (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
12 Dec 2020, 4:55 am by Sophia Tang
Summary of Facts Oscar Van Overeem, a Dutch architect, purchased a Buddhist statue for 40,000 Dutch guilders (US $20,500) in 1996 from a collector in Amsterdam who had acquired it in Hong Kong. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 12:33 pm by luiza
Royal Dutch Petroleum in 2012 (considering the broad question of corporate liability under the ATS and ultimately ruling on other grounds) and again in Jesner v. [read post]