Search for: "State v. E. N. W." Results 201 - 220 of 1,698
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Jon May
According to Justice Scalia: [W]e now have increasing evidence that police forces across the United States take the constitutional rights of citizens seriously. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
The SEC explained: [W]e believe that NEPA requires and authorizes the Commission to consider the promotion of environmental protection along with other considerations in determining whether to require affirmative disclosures by registrants under the Securities Act and the Securities and Exchange Act . . . . [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 7:45 am by Ronald Mann
[w]e do not see how we might fairly read the terms of the Restoration Act except in the same light. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 1:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
[W]e are asked to decide whether the First Amendment provides the public a qualified right of access to jurors' names during voir dire, thereby creating presumptive access to those names that can be overcome only on a case-by-case basis by showing both a compelling state interest and that denying access is a remedy narrowly tailored to serve that interest. [read post]
Or are questions like these irrelevant because, as the draft proclaims: “[W]e cannot allow our decisions to be affected by any extraneous influences such as concern about the public’s reaction to our work”? [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
  To mark this celebration of Sandy’s 40 years at the University of Texas, I want to argue that constitutional faith provides a path back to democracy in the United States. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm by David Kopel
However, originalist approaches the Coinage Clause and the N&P Clause just validate the long-standing status quo. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
[W]e fail to see how a judicial order preventing the Coptic church from removing those remains would constitute government interference with that church's free exercise of religion rights. [read post]