Search for: "State v. Elkin"
Results 201 - 220
of 222
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 5:48 am
Elkin-Koren: there will also be pressure to move to sites that are currently unregulated: WhatsApp viral distribution has been used in many countries, and it’s under the radar of the DSA. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:09 pm
Strudley v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:22 pm
" Bi-Lo is represented in this dispute by Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. and Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:27 am
Strudley v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:27 am
Strudley v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 8:00 am
Rumsfeld [16] and Burt v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm
Dixon Montague, Vinson & Elkins LLP, Houston Entry Statutes: A Taking or a Free Pass? [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
“The fact there have been 17 permits approved shows states are really figuring out how to do this,” Margaret Peloso, an attorney at Vinson & Elkins LLP who works on permits for industry clients, told BNA.Permits Target EfficienciesPSD requires new and modified sources to obtain permits for emissions of regulated air pollutants and to control those emissions using best available control technology (BACT), determined individually for each sourcePermitting includes a… [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 2:52 pm
Trump, California v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 9:04 am
No troll cartoons, unfortunately, but it was fun to watch Hilda talk about the SanDisk v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 5:11 am
Sharon Bar-Ziv and Niva Elkin-Koren's 2018 study of Israeli sites affected by DMCA requests to Google web search is the first work I’ve seen showing how a U.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:06 am
: how the case of Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
Where intention is clearly stated or evident, the analytical focus generally turns to whether the inchoate or unresolved aspects of the parties’ agreement are &ld [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 9:12 pm
United States and United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
3 May 2011, 6:43 am
[D057091] In Mark T. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Elkins Sinn, Inc., 102 Fed. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 1:17 am
The court gave no reason, but there had been vocal opposition to the proposal from the State Bar Association and county bars. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 5:48 pm
Rules of Court, rule 5.2(d); Elkins v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
“Head-of-state-owned enterprise” immunity. [read post]
