Search for: "State v. English"
Results 201 - 220
of 7,276
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am
The High Court found that the English Court had no jurisdiction to hear the case, and held that even if it had jurisdiction, the judge would have [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 11:54 am
[Amicus brief in Supreme Court's Second Amendment Rahimi case] This week amicus briefs were filed in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 9:57 am
Or is this concept state-centric? [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 2:46 pm
The issue before the court in Pulsifer v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 10:41 am
On the other side of the fence, many US states have adopted anti-ESG legislation[vi] that promotes financial returns over environmental concerns. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
But a cursory comparison of the equivalent piece of Australian federal legislation to the legislation at issue in Loper Bright Enterprises v Raimondo suggests it is at least not true in all cases. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 1:37 pm
Exceptionally strong writing skills in English, preferably journalistic in nature. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 1:37 pm
Exceptionally strong writing skills in English, preferably journalistic in nature. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 5:53 am
"[L]exicographers and the authors of English style guides have long changed practices to reflect the evolution of the English lexicon. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:09 am
As I previously noted in People v Gobrick, 510 Mich 1029, 1029 (2022) (WELCH, J., concurring), “lexicographers and the authors of English style guides have long changed practices to reflect the evolution of the English lexicon. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:56 am
The English High Court dismissed the case, however ClientEarth was granted an oral hearing at the High Court to have it reconsider their dismissal. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
One could not confidently say the same of the United States. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 3:43 am
It is also questionable whether the Court was correct in stating that consumer perception will only be relevant in certain circumstances, when the CJEU stated at least twice in Louboutin (at least in the English translation – see paras 43 and 48) that it was ‘necessary’, in order to determine whether a marketplace operator makes ‘use’ of a sign, to assess consumer perception. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:48 am
"The Second Circuit held years ago (Haley v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
COVID-19 Pandemic Issues The Honorable Susan V. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 8:09 am
Smyth v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:51 am
The propaganda strategy is not meant for the state apparatus of competitor states. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am
(Please note that these figures do not include state court securities class action lawsuit filings.) [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:25 am
[Jalla v Shell International Trading and Shipping Co Limited [2023] UK SC 16] [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
Although we are in the English summer legal vacation there are still a number of media and law developments in this jurisdiction and abroad. [read post]
