Search for: "State v. Flow" Results 201 - 220 of 5,644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2011, 12:39 am by charley foster
Thus, the dissent commented, "it appears that the mistake of the State in California v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am by Matthew Kahn
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit disagreed, concluding that it was bound by its 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 7:17 pm by Daniel Solove
Garcia No Undocumented Child Left Behind: Plyler v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
That the United States Supreme Court decided to hear the case of King v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:46 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In S v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Case C-304/14) (“CS”), it held that “in exceptional circumstances a member state may adopt an expulsion measure…”. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by David Ardia
This is part V in a series of posts discussing First Amendment Limits on State Laws Targeting Election Misinformation, 20 First Amend. [read post]
Two consequences flow from this: those convicted ought not to expect appeals to be readily allowed, and those who appeal to the Court of Appeal out of time may do so only if substantial injustice can be demonstrated. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 3:39 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
As explained in Hesham Ali v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] 1 WLR 4799, Parliamentary and public concern about failures to deport large numbers of foreign citizens who had committed serious offences in the UK led to the adoption of the UK Borders Act 2007, which provided that for the purpose of the Secretary of State’s power to deport under the 1971 Act, the deportation of a foreign criminal is conducive to the public good. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 11:55 am
Justice Myers in Sabey v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 10:16 pm by The Complex Litigator
While most of this opinion has nothing to do with class actions and everything to do with whether a judge can sua sponte reconsider a prior order and then recuse himself in the same minute order, Bates v. [read post]