Search for: "State v. G. G."
Results 201 - 220
of 11,891
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
G. v State of New York [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Actual or potential conflicts would include: The nature of the sponsor’s contingent compensation or security ownership (g., where the security owned is purchased at a price substantially lower than the price paid by public security holders) that may induce the sponsor and affiliates to pursue a business combination transaction that would not necessarily benefit the shareholders. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:40 pm
From K.B. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:48 pm
., State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:12 pm
Court’s Decision Based on the legal arguments presented, on November 24, 2023, Judge John G. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
”[18] Gunther sent his successor, G. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:40 am
More precisely Article 7 (2) of the Brussels Ia Regulation had to be interpreted, according to which a person domiciled in a Member State may be sued in another Member State, ‘in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict, in the courts for the place where the harmful event occurred or may occur’. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 12:30 am
Entitlement to priority (A-III-6.1)Following G 1/22 (and G 2/22), A-III-6.1 has been updated to state "absent any substantiated indication to the contrary, there is a strong rebuttable presumption under the EPC that an applicant or joint applicants claiming priority in accordance with Art. 88(1) and Rule 52 are also entitled to the claimed priority. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:24 pm
Citrus Publ’g, 725 So. 2d 1230 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am
The legal opinion would become popularly known as The Boldt Decision.The actual title of the case is United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:22 am
” In Martin v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Cunningham & Ute Römer-Barron, Four Reasons the Supreme Court Should Reconsider Its Article III Standing Doctrine, (Forthcoming, Ohio State Law Journal Online, v. 85, 2024).Elias Neibart, M.A. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
” 750 ILCS 5/600(g) If the move does not qualify as a “relocation” under 750 ILCS 5/600(g), just move and let the other parent know their drive to pick up their children for visitation will be that much longer. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
Kirtz and Murray v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:05 am
Chief Justice John G. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
These include the following, among other indicators: (i) the acquirer is “well-capitalized” and the resulting institution will be “well-capitalized”; (ii) the acquirer has a Community Reinvestment Act (the “CRA”) rating of Outstanding or Satisfactory; (iii) the resulting institution will have total assets of less than $50 billion; (iv) the acquirer has composite, management and consumer compliance ratings of 1 or 2; and (v) the acquirer has… [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm
Reilly, 2021 SCC 38, at para. 3; see also R. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:35 am
Rosen’s article Katcoff v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
MISSED SIX-YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONSAfter G&Y Maintenance started its case against McSam Hotel Group and others, alleging “breach of contract, account stated, breach of a fiduciary duty, fraud, and unjust enrichment,” the New York County Supreme Court ended up granting the defendants’ dismissal request.And on appeal, the Appellate Division, First Department, noted that since G&Y’s claims arose back in 2013, and the action hadn’t been… [read post]
