Search for: "State v. Gump" Results 201 - 220 of 376
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2008, 8:30 pm
Based on an earlier Ninth Circuit decision, Pallas v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 11:08 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
 Indeed, New York state does not recognize a common law right of privacy, only a statutory right of publicity, and New York right of publicity statute only forbids the use without consent of a person’s name, portrait, picture or voice “for advertising purposes or for the purposes of trade. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:56 am
United States Issue: Whether Harris v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 12:28 pm by Anna Christensen
Federal Communications CommissionDocket: 10-189Issue(s): Whether the court of appeals violated Supreme Court precedent by upholding a ruling allowing the Federal Communications Commission to set rates for local intrastate communications by replacing those state rates with a mandatory interstate rate.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (DC Circuit)Petition for certiorari Akin Gump and Howe & Russell serve as counsel in the following case, which is listed without regard to… [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 3:35 am by R. David Donoghue
Goldstein of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and publisher of SCOTUSblog; Deborah Jones Merritt, John Deaver Drinko-Baker & Hostetler Chair in Law at Moritz College of Law, Ohio State University (court-appointed amicus in Reed Elsevier); Jeffrey M. [read post]
15 May 2008, 8:24 am
Taylor (CVSG 1/14/2008) (Akin Gump for petitioner) (settling FMLA claims) No. 07-543, AT&T v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 7:45 am
(Disclosure: Akin Gump represents the petitioner) Opinion below (3rd Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply __________________ Docket: 07-1019 Case name: Gorman, Jr., et al. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:12 pm
Opinion below(7th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Docket: 08-769 Title: United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 11:18 am
Colorado and applied the 4th Amendment to the states, and it started a whole trend, a series of cases, from Reynolds v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:41 pm
Finally, the Court will weigh a petition from the state of South Carolina — Stewart v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:36 pm
United States Issue: Whether the holding in Roe v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:23 am
Gerald Goldman, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, et al., Defendants-Respondents. [read post]
Oct. 30, 2009) (per curiam) (restricted appeal of default judgment, error on the face of the record, time of service not noted on return of citation)INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 6:25 am
  Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP represented the Sandler Defendants. [read post]