Search for: "State v. Heap"
Results 201 - 220
of 230
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
It has given us unprecedented access to public affairs information—local, state, national, and international. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 8:19 am
, but I might have went with this bon mot:For each ecstatic instantWe must an anguish payIn keen and quivering ratioTo the ectasty.For each beloved hourSharp pittances of years,Bitter contested farthingsAnd coffers heaped with tears.I don't know, maybe the Judge's reference was more on-point.Then we have Judge Huck's reference to that dreaded hip Eurobeast, international "law":In refusing to recognize the judgment, the Court applied the “international concept… [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
" Stalley v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:37 am
(IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Stay pending reexam denied because a stay would result in ‘more significant’ prejudice given the Court’s overall speed in disposing patent cases: Telecommunication Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 12:00 pm
State v Urgrovics2. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 1:04 pm
In reaching this conclusion, the trial court relied on what it characterized as the "procedures" mandated by the Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 2:32 pm
See McKellar v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 11:54 am
You may remember Kelo v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 7:09 am
The recent 5-4 Supreme Court ruling on the New Haven Fire Department vocational advancement exam in Ricci v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:42 am
. -- builds up and you need an outlet for the hostility and aggression.No, me neither.So let's see, those into the craft of law can watch the Pleus v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:53 am
As the US Supreme Court said in Tehan v United States, 383 US 406, 416 (1996), "[t]he basic purpose of a trial is the determination of truth. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 9:00 pm
The libel laws belong in the trash heap. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 9:00 pm
On January 30, the Second Circuit decided Abdullahi v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 10:53 am
State of Rhode Island v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 5:00 pm
Considerable criticism has been heaped on CEO compensation. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
See, e.g., PPG Indus. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 1:13 am
Well, the courts saw it Uphold Our Heritage's way and the state Supreme Court refused to take an appeal in April. [read post]
17 May 2008, 8:35 pm
Smith v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 11:44 am
(For example, see Yamagiwa v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:24 am
Schweitzer, No. 06-35384 Dismissal of a state takings claims arising out of a state ban on open-pit mining for gold or silver by the cyanide heap leaching process is affirmed where the Eleventh Amendment bars a reverse condemnation action brought in federal court against state officers in their official capacities. [read post]
