Search for: "State v. Hoffmann"
Results 201 - 220
of 296
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2009, 11:03 pm
And now, rather surprisingly, the Cour de Cassation apparently shows us that Turner and West Tankers can be circumvented by executing a non-Brussels Lugano state's anti-suit injunction, at least in some states. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:28 am
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., 392 F.Supp.2d 907, 919 (S.D. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm
In the Intercept, Glenn Greenwald draws attention to the fact that Amazon is itself involved in the building of a surveillance state. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
As found by the Federal Court in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am
It is of course open to member states to provide for rights more generous than those guaranteed by the Convention, but such provision should not be the product of interpretation of the Convention by national courts, since the meaning of the Convention should be uniform throughout the states party to it. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm
Lord Hoffmann (in the minority) gave real weight to the editorial discretion, stating at [62]: “Editorial decisions have to be made quickly and with less information than is available to a court which afterwards reviews the matter at leisure. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia… [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., 891 A.2d 1229 (N.J. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 5:38 am
I have students look at the lynching postcards (see the Without Sanctuary website) during a discussion of the legality of lynching.Elizabeth Hoffmann: I show The Road to Brown about the legal and social “paths" leading up to Brown v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 7:01 am
Thomas Koch of Hoffmann Eitle, noted. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 11:59 pm
Part V. [read post]
28 May 2007, 5:17 am
Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 11:36 am
You can separately subscribe to the Pharma & Biotech edition of the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review by subscribing by email, or selecting ‘all posts’ or ‘Pharma, Biotech & Chem’ for the RSS option at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Plavix (Clopidogrel) – Canada: Supreme Court upholds selection patents: Apotex v Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada et al (Pharmacapsules @ Gowlings)… [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:26 pm
Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., 99 N.J. 284, 302, 491 A.2d 1257 (1985). [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:55 am
In Bright Lord Judge CJ cited from Lord Camden CJ’s judgment in Entick v Carrington and from William Pitt, Earl of Chatham. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
See today’s In the courts Luton Borough Council & Nottingham City Council & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin) (11 February 2011): Coalition cancellation of school-building program was unlawful. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:00 am
Thus R. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
