Search for: "State v. Hollingsworth"
Results 201 - 220
of 336
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm
The one-sentence order immediately nullified a stay order issued last June by the Circuit Court in the “Proposition 8″ case — Hollingsworth v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 8:27 am
The same day, it issued an opinion in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 6:30 am
Hollingsworth v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:30 am
Windsor Hollingsworth v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 6:15 am
Briefly: At Constitution Daily, Lyle discusses how recent events in Rhode Island and Delaware, which became the tenth and eleventh states to allow same-sex marriage, may influence the Justices as they decide Hollingsworth v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 8:09 am
In Perry, the state of California (represented by a guy named Hollingsworth) asked for it to be reversed, which should have kept it alive. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 12:25 pm
Holder (Voting Rights Act) Merits Brief in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 3:00 pm
In a decision June 26 in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:31 pm
See United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:24 am
McAdams, Reforming Entrapment Doctrine in United States v Hollingsworth, 74 U Chi L Rev 1795 (2007) Thomas J. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
Brown (now Hollingsworth v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 9:02 am
Tuesday, March 26: 12-144 – Hollingsworth v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:42 am
Ball State University, Mutual Pharmaceutical Company v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
” For this blog, Marty Lederman looks at the significance of the amicus briefs opposing same-sex marriage in Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm
Baker v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:18 am
The same day as Windsor, theCourt in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:46 am
Perry, United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 1:05 pm
Hollingsworth, it's literally impossible to believe that the justices do not regularly take consequences into account in deciding what they do. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:32 pm
So do we.So we're glad to call your attention to the recent decision in Ingram v. [read post]
