Search for: "State v. Hughes"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,799
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2007, 3:30 pm
Roger Falk and Christopher Hughes won in State v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
This is the first successful legal challenge to AFR technology and an important decision in relation to the regulation of state surveillance. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm
Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 10:06 am
On 2 May 1996, the applicant put out a press release stating that its next issue would include a letter from the Earth Liberation Front (“ELF”) which claimed responsibility for a bomb attack on 16 April 1996. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 11:40 am
In a recent insurer’s failure-to-settle case, Hughes v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 11:40 am
In a recent insurer’s failure-to-settle case, Hughes v. [read post]
Medical Device Cases Brightened by Recent U.S. Court of Appeals Decision; Stengel v. Medtronic, Inc.
12 Oct 2013, 9:00 am
In a 5th Circuit case of Hughes v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 4:06 am
SNF Holding Co. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a specialist in media and information law at Matrix Chambers and an editor of Inforrm. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm
Unenforceability in the United States The Judge noted that, since 1964 when the Supreme Court of the United States decided New York Times v Sullivan 376 US 254 (1964), there has not been a single reported State or Federal decision in which a foreign defamation judgment has been recognised and enforced in the United States [89]. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 11:01 am
However, the plaintiff in Hughes v Region VII Area Agency on Aging, ___F.3d___, Nos. 07-1570/1647 (6th Cir. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 12:54 pm
In the case of Hughes v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:20 am
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama granted summary judgment to the NSBA in National Small Business United v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 2:00 am
In the case of Ion Cârstea v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
In terms of materiality, he considered the House of Lords’ decision in Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:13 pm
It emphasised the importance of discussion around the State’s monopoly on the use of force, but set that against P. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 4:04 pm
It stated that the claimant had been passing confidential information to ex-employees of CSP who were working for a rival agency and that criminal proceedings were being considered (for the full text, see [4]). [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:52 am
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of Matrix chambers and an editor of Inforrm [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:33 pm
That exercise is primarily a function of national courts, in respect of which states enjoy a margin of appreciation, subject to the supervision of the Strasbourg Court [96] – [97]. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
It stated that if the claimant were to win the by-election, then Hughes would not seek to stand as the Conservative party candidate in the general election. [read post]
