Search for: "State v. Irwin" Results 201 - 220 of 301
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
Coomber heard 9 and 16 November 2011 (HHJ Moloney QC) El-Naschie v Macmillan, heard 11, 14, 16 to 18, 21, 22, 25, 28-30 November, 1 -2 December 2011 (Sharp J) Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Chambers v DPP, heard 8 February 2012 (Gross LJ and Irwin J) Qema v NGN Ltd heard 29 February and 1 March 2012 (Sharp J) Hunt v Times Newspapers, heard 9 and 12 March 2012 (Eady J) Bento v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire,… [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
Over in the States, London-based solicitor Mark Lewis is working with Norman Siegel of Siegel Teitelbaum & Evans LLP and Steven Hyman of McLaughlin & Stern LLP to look into allegations of phone hacking in the US. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP
It is however an established principle of Strasbourg jurisprudence that such a right does not extend so far as to impose a positive obligation on public authorities to disclose or distribute information (see Leander v Sweden (1987) 9 EHRR 433 or Roche v United Kingdom (2005) 42 EHRR 599). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:12 am by New Books Script
JZ 6368 T48 2011 The people vs. the state : reflections on UN authority, US power and the responsibility to protect Ramesh Thakur. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am by INFORRM
The adjudication states: “The article under complaint was a feature on Gary Dobson and David Norris, who had recently been convicted of the murder of Stephen Lawrence. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:47 am by Kiran Bhat
Writing in the Baltimore Sun, Irwin E. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:15 am by INFORRM
He pointed to the fact that Irwin J appeared to have had no difficulty in concluding that the dominant purpose for which the BBC had held financial journalism was that of journalism in BBC v Information Commissioner [2009] EWHC 2348 (see [55] and [57] in particular). [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
The group’s e-petition calls on the Ministry of Justice to “leave FoI alone”, stating, “the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOI) has exposed the scandal of MPs’ expenses, and many examples of waste and improper behaviour by public authorities, politicians and public officials. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 4:43 am by Anita Davies
Irwin Mitchell has been forced to defend its pricing policy after Lord Neuberger highlighted a case in which it charged six times the amount paid out to its client. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
. “This article is inaccurate and misrepresents the facts” the corporation stated, as reported by Tabloid Watch here. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:55 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
This was overturned by Irwin J and that decision then upheld by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:06 am by Adam Wagner
The BBC’s primary contention, upheld by Irwin J and the Court of Appeal, was that the BBC had to disclose information only in category (1) subject to particular exemptions under other provisions of FOIA [73]. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
The Financial Times has reproduced New International CEO Tom Mockridge’s memo to staff here (subscription required), which states “We must take care not to prejudge the outcome of the police interviews. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:00 am by INFORRM
The only available guidance derives from DPP v Collins ([2006] UKHL 40), an appeal from the Divisional Court. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:10 am by New Books Script
48 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 3 from 2012: Copy of order in Council. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:21 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP
Delivering the verdict in favour of the BBC, Lord Neuberger found himself largely in agreement with Irwin J of the High Court. [read post]