Search for: "State v. J. D. C."
Results 201 - 220
of 3,194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2023, 2:54 pm
Pond, J. [read post]
12 May 2023, 3:00 am
On (2), one had to conduct a multifactorial assessment based on all the circumstances of the case which included the relevant factors set out by David Stone in MEI Fields Designs Ltd v Saffron Cards and Gifts Ltd [2018] EWHC 132 (IPEC) as follows: (a) the terms of the contract of employment; (b) where the work was created; (c) whether the work was created during normal office hours; (d) who provided the materials for [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:07 am
C. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:49 pm
” There seems to be only one relevant precedent: Televest v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 9:32 am
Plaintiff also relies on United States v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:20 am
The new certification criterion is further laid out and explained in a special approval status rule for certain subsequent applicants at proposed FDC Act § 505(j)(5)(D)(v): (v) SPECIAL APPROVAL STATUS RULE FOR CERTAIN SUBSEQUENT APPLICANTS. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Caroline J. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Caroline J. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Katz, Sabastian V. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Katz, Sabastian V. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 5:30 am
In the case of Franks v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 7:16 pm
" here)What do these state anti-ESG bills look like? [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:23 am
Rev. 265 (2018) (with Rochelle C. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm
An intertribal business court. / Crepelle, Adam C. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 11:30 am
C. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 1:53 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 2:56 am
Item (f) about claim charts should be left to the way the courts apply Huawei v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
In Bernstein v Industrial Commissioner, 57 AD2d 767, 4 NYCRR 5.3(d) was held to violate the employee's right to due process. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
In Bernstein v Industrial Commissioner, 57 AD2d 767, 4 NYCRR 5.3(d) was held to violate the employee's right to due process. [read post]