Search for: "State v. Johnson" Results 201 - 220 of 7,272
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 8:09 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
The Minnesota Court of Appeals decided that these types of warrants do not violate the United States and Minnesota constitutions per se, and further found that the warrant at issue in State of Minnesota v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  (I expect to assign the first article when I teach Johnson v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm by NARF
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2024.html Johnson, et al. v. [read post]