Search for: "State v. K. T."
Results 201 - 220
of 3,505
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
Omega Flex, Inc., 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014), we stated up front that we didn’t think that Tincher changed Pennsulvania law applicable to prescription medical products much, if at all. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:34 am
Ct. at 1018; see also United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm
Overall, there are some good legal findings in the current K-12 decision, from the standpoint of public policy. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:53 am
State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 5:00 am
TEXAS No State Income Tax UTAH 2.30 - 6.98 (t) 6 1,000 (b) - 5,501 (b) 2,550 (d) 5,100 (d) 2,550 (d) * (t) VERMONT (a) 3.6 - 9.5 5 30,650 (u) 336,551 (u) 3,400 (d) 6,800 (d) 3,400 (d) VIRGINIA 2.0 - 5.75 4 3,000 - 17,000 900 1,800 900 WASHINGTON No State Income Tax WEST VIRGINIA 3.0 - 6.5 5 10,000 - 60,000 2,000 4,000 2,000 … [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 3:18 am
Hoffmann, Counterclaims in Investment Arbitration Charles T. [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:02 pm
While in such circumstances one may possibly speak of a business “in a frozen state” or a “residual” business, there is nevertheless still a business (see decision G 4/88 [5]: “an economic activity which is or could be carried on” [emphasis added by the board]). [28] In the present case, when the Agreement was concluded, Protogene still owned valuable tangible and intangible property relating to its business as defined in the introductory part of the… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 7:29 am
K & N Engineering, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:32 am
CAAF published its opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
Specifically, under the PCT this is a formal deficiency under Article 14(1)(a)(v) in combination with Rule 11.13(a), which can be remedied upon invitation under Article 14(1)(b). [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:48 am
Under no circumstances,’ underlines judge Kūris in his elaborated dissenting opinion in Mesić v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 1:00 pm
., P.C. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
Neal K. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:04 am
Delaware Dep’t of Natural Resources v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
Combining these two and stating that G 2/10 has added criteria to G 1/03 does not sound right to me. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 9:07 am
State Dep’t of Envtl. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:22 pm
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Petitioner v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:22 pm
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Petitioner v. [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 5:07 am
" Kaufhold v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 4:04 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse suggests that Monday’s oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
