Search for: "State v. L. M." Results 201 - 220 of 5,067
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2023, 4:00 pm by gA
El texto que circuló mucho es “Répertoire méthodique et alphabétique de législation, de doctrine et de jurisprudence", una enciclopedia de 33 tomos. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:29 am by Eugene Volokh
At the hearing, the parties argued the import of the recent decision of State of Missouri v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 2:34 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In response, policyholders have argued (with varying degrees of success from state to state) that public policy concerns are the properly left to the legislative branch. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am by Zak Gowen
Einer Elhauge, has stated:  “Dozens of empirical studies have now confirmed this economic reality that common shareholding alters corporate behavior. [read post]
Finally, the federal government spends approximately $1.2 trillion dollars every year, or about 19% of all federal spending, on programs that fund or are related to the states. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:21 pm by Bill Marler
State laboratories can send STEC cultures to the CDC to determine the serotype. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm by Tomasz Tadeusz Koncewicz
“Fondements mêmes de l’ordre juridique communautaire”; Kadi, para. 304) comprise today: a) the primacy of the EU law that undergirds the autonomy of the law of integration; b)institutional balance established by the Treaties; c) the judicial review and the Court’s function of the guardian of Union legality under Article 19 TEU; d) the protection of fundamental rights; e) liberty; f) democracy; g) rule of law. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:47 pm
But to be effective these ought to focus on targeted states rather than on the modalities of leading state self-actualization. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 10:57 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
The BIA determined that Avila’s PSG did not “exist independently” of the harm alleged, as required under Matter of M-E-V-G-113 and Matter of W-G-R-. 114 Matter of M-E-V-G- cites to this Court’s prior precedent in Lukwago v. [read post]