Search for: "State v. Livingston"
Results 201 - 220
of 498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2018, 6:31 am
The Court of Appeals (Parker, Livingston and Chin) notes that plaintiff a full opportunity to litigate this issue in state court. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:53 am
They even have the right to give the Quran to a prison guard.The case is Washington v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:03 am
The trial court took away that verdict, and now the case has been handed off the New York Court of Appeals to decide a tricky state law question.The case is Ferreira v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 3:52 am
While the state argues that this case cannot be filed in federal court, the Court of Appeals (Kearse, Livingston and Pooler) says that "the collateral order doctrine has been held not applicable to permit immediate appeal of decisions denying motions to dismiss on the ground that plaintiffs' claims should be adjudicated in a different forum. [read post]
24 May 2017, 5:36 am
This is the state's rights theory of habeas corpus jurisprudence.Writing for a 2-1 majority, Judge Livingston says Waiters cannot satisfy his burden in showing the state court had unreasonably denied his habeas petition. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 8:52 am
But the Court of Appeals (Raggi, Winter and Livingston) is hesitant to reject this argument entirely. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 5:06 pm
TMZ states, Livingston is suing for libel, invasion of privacy and for using his name and likeness without his permission. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:29 am
In 1955, the Court said in Quinn v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 6:44 am
The Court of Appeals does not agree, and the conviction stands.The case is United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 7:33 am
The decision sheds light on what the Court wants the complaints to look like.The case is Bohnet v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 5:36 am
The case is In re New York City Policing During Summer 2020 Demonstrations v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:33 am
This case shows that the so-called "rule of completeness" has its limits.The case is United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:32 am
The case is Romano v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 7:31 am
The Court states, "it would be rather adventurous to infer an FRSA requirement that a railroad take employees at their word that the reason for a failure to report to work was an easily verifiable doctor-prescribed mind-altering drug. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 12:33 pm
The state concedes that filing the grievance is protected conduct under the First Amendment. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 6:08 am
" In this state, he would act act impulsively and get into verbal confrontations. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 12:04 pm
The Second Circuit will be hearing the appeal of the district court decision in Leroy v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 6:38 am
Thanks to Greg Lastowka for pointing me to this case: Bach v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:06 am
The content of plaintiff's speech was strictly personal, the Court of Appeals (Parker, Hall and Livingston) says. [read post]
