Search for: "State v. Long"
Results 201 - 220
of 46,386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2008, 6:10 pm
Australian commentators have long speculated about whether the federal Constitution contains any rule that would resolve a direct conflict between the statute law of two States. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
ATTORNEY FAILED TO EXPLAIN AWAY YEAR-LONG DELAYAfter HGL was injured in a motorcycle accident, he filed suit against TMM and other defendants in the Queens County Supreme Court.When the latter moved to dismiss the litigation, claiming that HGL’s injuries weren’t “serious,” as defined by the state’s Insurance Law, HGL failed to oppose the motion.About a year later, after HGL moved to vacate his default, and the Supreme Court denied that request, an… [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 4:06 pm
This past week, the Florida Supreme Court denied a petition for certiorari in the long-running takings case of Koontz v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:58 am
See United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:47 am
United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:14 am
Hart v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 8:57 am
DC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
State v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:30 am
United States (here) the long-awaited decision on whether a U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:34 am
In a long awaited decision to Wal-Mart's petition, the United States Supreme Court granted review in Dukes v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 11:56 am
Following up on yesterday's post about the admissibility of prior conivctions for sex crimes for impeachment purposes, I give you another in a long line of ridiculous impeachment cases from the great state of Minnesota: State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:40 pm
In United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:31 am
Fox v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:09 pm
The Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision overruling its long-standing physical presence rule in South Dakota v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 11:48 pm
This case joins Washington State Grange v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:32 am
Background Last week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 1:53 pm
The Facts of State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:01 am
State Building and Construction Trades Council of California, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:45 pm
This law essentially provides for the admission of recorded conversations as long as at least one party consented to the recording, unless the party making the recording acts with a purpose to violate state law or to commit a tortious act. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 8:27 am
Fischer v. [read post]
