Search for: "State v. M. C." Results 201 - 220 of 6,523
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
SEC Files Complaints Alleging Pump And Dump Scheme Involving Shell Company
23 Apr 2016, 4:54 am
Luke C. [read post]
Broke and Broker - http://brokeandbroker.com/index.php
New Issue: Climate Law
1 Jul 2020, 8:12 am
Contents include:Phillipa C. [read post]
International Law Reporter - http://ilreports.blogspot.com/
:@WilliamBaude: Unanimous Juries and Incorporation of the Bill of Rights
26 Mar 2019, 3:00 am by Will Baude
Here, as usual, I'm in the debt of Chris Green, who has written: The[] four most plausible approaches for basic privileges that must be given to all citizens of the United States are (a) rights in the Bill of Rights or elsewhere in the text of the federal constitution as limits on the federal government, (b) rights prevalent in 1868, when the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted, (c) morally-genuine rights, and (d) rights prevalent today, at the time we are applying the… [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
SCOTUSBlog: Davis v. U.S. argument recap
22 Mar 2011, 3:52 am
SCOTUSBlog: Davis v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
A Response to Kevin Heller on Doe v. Nestle
11 Oct 2011, 9:12 am by Michael Ramsey
Supreme Court in Sosa v. [read post]
Opinio Juris - http://opiniojuris.org
MN: DNA testing of juvenile for lesser included misdemeanor was reasonable
26 Apr 2010, 5:49 am
State v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
"Schools are under a duty to adequately supervise the students in their charge and they will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 49; see D.M. v Yonkers City Sch. Dist., 220 AD3d 672). "Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d at 49; see R.B. v Sewanhaka Cent. High Sch. Dist., 207 AD3d 607, 609).
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on June 12, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentMARK C. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
"Schools are under a duty to adequately supervise the students in their charge and they will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 49; see D.M. v Yonkers City Sch. Dist., 220 AD3d 672). "Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d at 49; see R.B. v Sewanhaka Cent. High Sch. Dist., 207 AD3d 607, 609).
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on June 12, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentMARK C. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Case Dismissed Over Disputed Patent Ownership
26 Apr 2019, 3:15 am by R. David Donoghue
LP v. [read post]
Chicago IP Litigation Blog - http://www.chicagoiplitigation.com/
N.-M. Ct. App. en banc reverses Weston; husband's objection to consent at CID office did not prevent CID from asking wife without telling her
3 Apr 2008, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
Law Stories for Diversity Week
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am by Mary Whisner
Cain and Jean C. [read post]
Gallagher Blogs - http://gallagherlawlibrary.blogspot.com/
Another Development in Sullivan & Cromwell v. Charney
19 Apr 2007, 2:47 pm
New York State Supreme Court Justice Bernard J. [read post]
Leonard Link - http://newyorklawschool.typepad.com/leonardlink/
Anderson v. State Farm (9th Cir. - March 8, 2019)
8 Mar 2019, 1:20 pm
  We also rely on state law to decide what agents are appointed "by law" under Rule 4(e)(2)(C). [read post]
California Appellate Report - http://calapp.blogspot.com/
Ind. Decisions - Court of Appeals issues 0 today (and 5 NFP)
15 Nov 2006, 7:20 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Chad M. [read post]
The Indiana Law Blog - http://indianalawblog.com/
Lewis v. Clarke, Docket 15-1500
20 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm
S. 30, 39, 48 (1994)).Secondary sources: M. [read post]
Frederic Borel - http://fredericborel.blogspot.ch/
Another Must-Carry Lawsuit Against YouTube Fails–Daniels v Alphabet
6 Apr 2021, 9:20 am by Eric Goldman
Still, I’m adding Domen v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
California COA ICWA Notice Case
13 Sep 2016, 6:42 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the opinion in In re Michael V. [read post]
Turtle Talk - http://turtletalk.wordpress.com/
CAAF: Matlock and Randolph must be read together; CA9 rejected, CA7,8 followed
23 Jun 2009, 5:43 am
United States v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
Legal Malpractice and Judgment Calls in the Mortgage Industry
10 Jun 2011, 2:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Stein, P.C., Robert M. [read post]
New York Attorney Malpractice Blog - http://blog.bluestonelawfirm.com/
Ind. Decisions - Court of Appeals issues 0 today (and 7 NFP)
30 Aug 2007, 11:43 am
State of Indiana (NFP) James M. [read post]
The Indiana Law Blog - http://indianalawblog.com/