Search for: "State v. MacDonald" Results 201 - 220 of 394
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Sterling Drug, Inc., 795 P.2d 915, 931 (Kan. 1990) (“compliance with FDA rules and regulations creates only a rebuttable presumption that the warnings are adequate”); MacDonald v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Jeff Welty
” He notes that the North Carolina court of appeals is one of several courts that have reached contrary results, see State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 7:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE, heard 13 and 14 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an application… [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 11:50 am
MacDonald, of Toronto firm, Markson Macdonald said, shortly after the Supreme Court's February 28, 2008 ruling. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster & Ors) v North Yorkshire County Council, heard 3 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe Estates Ltd (Scotland), heard 4 December 2019 AM (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4-5 December 2019. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 5:33 pm by David Smith
This also means that for these tenancies cases such as Church Commissioners v Meya, Macdonald v Fernandez, and Lower St Properties v Jones are also all irrelevant as they all deal with aspects of s21(4)(a) notices. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 5:33 pm by David Smith
This also means that for these tenancies cases such as Church Commissioners v Meya, Macdonald v Fernandez, and Lower St Properties v Jones are also all irrelevant as they all deal with aspects of s21(4)(a) notices. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 2:41 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
MacDonald & Anor v Carnbroe Estates Ltd (Scotland), heard 2 May 2019. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 7:31 am by Andrew Vey
Something of a formula may now be discerned: If you want to enforce a clause, rely on decisions like MacDonald v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 4:04 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
MacDonald & Anor v Carnbroe Estates Ltd (Scotland), heard 2 May 2019. [read post]
20 May 2020, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
The original two judgments can be found here : A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2020] EWFC 38 (11 May 2020) (Main judgment) A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2020] EWHC 1162 (Fam) (11 May 2020 (Original decision to anonymise) The latest judgment can be found here : PA Media Group v London Borough of Haringey & Ors [2020] EWHC 1282 (Fam) (20 May 2020) You can read Louise Tickle’s tweet thread here : Our team member @louisetickle is a… [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 2:13 am by UKSC Blog
MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe Estates Ltd (Scotland), heard 4 December 2019. [read post]