Search for: "State v. Makee R." Results 201 - 220 of 34,854
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2022, 10:25 am by Brad Schnure
Wade and reasserted the democratic principle that elected state legislatures and the communities they represent should have the opportunity to make their own decisions on abortion without the mandates of an overbearing unelected federal judiciary,” said Senate Republican Leader Steven Oroho (R-24). [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 2:05 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
 The Court considered that the Ministry of Justice has failed to make provision for facilities at the hearing centre, or for access to such facilities abroad, as would allow the appellants to give live evidence and participate in the hearing. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 1:50 pm by Giles Peaker
C, R (on the application of) v The London Borough of Islington (2017) EWHC 1288 (Admin) C was accepted for the full housing duty by Islington, with her 3 children, as a result of domestic violence. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 4:51 pm by Utah Criminal Defense Blog
In State of Utah v Brooks, Andrew Brooks appealed the district court’s decision to revoke and reinstate his probation and serve a minimum of 90 days in jail. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 11:33 am
Wolf, Samuel Crandall and Treaty-Making in the United States [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:50 pm
Nor did the Trust have a physical presence, make any direct investments, or hold any real property in the State. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 5:44 am by HANNAH WILCE
This should make it easier to argue that the Crown is bound by Acts of Parliament. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:40 am by Jack Kennedy
As such, consideration of ECHR, art 6 ought to have formed part of the Secretary of State’s decision-making process. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:06 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix.
Perhaps in fear of the Supreme Court having a reduced role in criminal jurisprudence, the Court of Appeal’s refusal to certify a point was recently challenged in the case of R v James Lee Dunn. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:46 am by ANDREW BODNAR, MATRIX
Analysis On its own this decision once again concludes the arguments about postponement of confiscation proceedings, but it should be read in the light of the decisions in R v Waya [2012] UIKSC 51, R v Ahmad, R v Fields [2014] UKSC 36 and R v Harvey [2015] UKSC 73. [read post]