Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 201 - 220
of 19,773
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Kantor v Commissioner of Internal Revenue - The issue for decision in this case was whether the taxpayer was entitled under section 475(f) to use the mark-to-market method of accounting in connection with his business as a securities trader. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
In Forest Group Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:54 am
Mark Brandon's new book, State of Union: Family and Change in the American Constitutional Order, will be out next month from the University Press of Kansas. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:43 am
Thus, when evaluating the marks in their entireties, the marks were not likely to be confused. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 7:37 pm
’s motion to dismiss trademark infringement and dilution claims brought by the Navajo Nation (The Navajo Nation v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am
State v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 5:11 am
Gravelle v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:40 am
In particular, he took notice of footnote number 2, which states as follow: "Rosetta Stone conducted a brand equity study in February 2009 showing a substantial gap in actual recognition of the Rosetta Stone mark and the closest competing brand. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:37 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:41 am
On 25 March 2019, the Australian Trade Marks Office (ATMO) handed down a decision in Comite International Olympique v Tempting Brands Netherlands BV. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 5:01 am
Defendant's Motion for Judicial Notice dated August13, 2007, filed in State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 12:44 pm
Dr Joseph Fesenmair (Bird & Bird, Munich) then gave an explanation of the Court of Justice of the European Union's ruling last year in Case C-487/07 L'Oréal v Bellure. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:31 am
It just a few months ago that this blog reported on the Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev in the Sky v SkyKick, C-371/18 case.important A referral from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales made by Arnold J (as he then was), the Sky case is probably the most important referral in the EU trade mark field made over the past few years. [read post]
16 May 2018, 11:03 am
See Quality Inns Intern., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 2:55 pm
In Cheah v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 11:28 pm
This provision requires applicants to state that the trade mark is being used, or that the applicant has a bona fide intention to use the trade mark. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 6:32 am
Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 17 (2005), quoting United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 5:59 am
The court sua sponte dismissed plaintiff's qui tam false marking action for failure to state a claim following the enactment of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:36 am
Defendant's motion to stay plaintiff's qui tam false marking case pending the Federal Circuit's resolution of Stauffer v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:01 am
McDonald’s Corporation v. [read post]
