Search for: "State v. Ortiz"
Results 201 - 220
of 529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2017, 1:10 pm
United States and Ortiz v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 3:28 pm
" United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 12:06 pm
In the recent case of Ortiz v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:23 am
Ortiz determined Winvestigator had started to log keystrokes at 5:37 p.m. on February 10, 2008. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 7:00 am
Two months ago I wrote about a set of cases pending at the Supreme Court from the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces: Dalmazzi, Cox, & Ortiz v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:10 pm
The State of Texas filed an amicus brief in this case at the petition stage. [read post]
7 May 2007, 1:12 am
Ortiz, 484 U.S. 301, 304 (1988) (per curiam); B.H. ex rel. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:09 am
Co. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 11:18 am
Bukkapatnum stated Ms. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:09 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in Lomax v. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am
Napue v People of State of Illinois, 360 US 264; Pyle v State of Kansas, 317 US 213; cf. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 6:21 am
The case is Ortiz v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 1:14 pm
Similarly, in Ortiz v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 3:06 pm
In Galaviz, v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 4:14 pm
A review of the forfeiture complaint filed in the Eastern District of New York reveals the facts and law supporting the government's claim.In the case of U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 7:12 am
United States, Black v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
**For the full text of the decision, go to:http://nypublicpersonnellawarchives.blogspot.com/2007/02/no-right-to-name-clearing-hearing.html* The “New York Rule” in such situations is discussed in Ortiz v Ward, 546 NYS2d 624. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:54 am
Nov. 26, 2014); Ortiz v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 2:41 pm
The case Meghan Christmas v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 12:00 pm
United States, where Justice Jackson was the only member of the Court to join Justice Gorsuch’s majority opinion in full; and Andy Warhol Foundation for Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]