Search for: "State v. Peaks"
Results 201 - 220
of 797
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2019, 1:10 pm
The first published case to determine the admissibility of expert testimony regarding retrograde extrapolation was State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 1:10 pm
The first published case to determine the admissibility of expert testimony regarding retrograde extrapolation was State v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 6:30 am
R., Putz-Anderson, V., Garg, A., & Fine, L. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
The Tenth Circuit has not yet ruled on whether such a First Amendment right of access exists in civil cases, see United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Larry Lessig is clearly one of the most interesting and imaginative scholars within the legal academy, and he has written a book that fully vindicates the enthusiastic blurbs it receives (from myself, as well as others). [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:18 am
Plaintiffs countered that INDOT failed to take into account the peak traffic volume numbers at that time, but the judge ruled that wasn’t necessary. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:03 am
As you can see below, frequency of this word peaked in the years 2005-2013. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 5:30 am
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:15 am
Dillon v Peak Envtl., LLC 2019 NY Slip Op 04548 Decided on June 7, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department is the story of an upstate commercial case which went through a lot of procedural wrangling, up to the Appellate Division, with little forward movement. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 7:31 am
In this case, veterans can point to Pratt v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:00 pm
In this case, veterans can point to Pratt v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 1:43 pm
Look at expected uses v. unexpected uses? [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am
In 1925, in its decision in Gitlow v. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 10:37 am
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenesisolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 6:07 am
The verdict in Sterns v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:57 am
” (The new decision came in the case of Bucklew v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am
BMG v Cox is good, but music industry is still unhappy. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 9:07 pm
The state legislative season is currently peaking, with action in many states extending into April and May. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 9:04 am
A court ruled that “stop-and-frisk” violated the Fourth Amendment in Floyd v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 5:50 pm
He stated he took a full-strength aspirin tablet (325 mg) every day but was not on any other blood thinners. [read post]
