Search for: "State v. Pride" Results 201 - 220 of 871
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2007, 12:08 pm
The appeals court agreed with the Michigan attorney general, Republican Mike Cox, who said in a March 2005 opinion that same-sex benefits are not allowed in a state that does not recognize same-sex unions.Thanks to How Appealing, here is the Michigan opinion in National Pride v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:51 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
The Case of the Juror Who Punches Himself During Deliberations In State of Washington v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 11:27 pm by Frank Cranmer
He argued that, as pastor of a local church, it was entirely reasonable for him to state what he considered to be a Christian response to the Pride March – that attending it was not compatible with a biblical world view. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:15 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
By Joshua Scott Chilton, Legal Assistant & Receptionist, Woodruff Family Law Group On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States of America made a ruling in a case known as Obergefell v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 12:25 pm by Shea Denning
Regardless, North Carolinians of all viewpoints can take pride of the way the rule of law has been executed in this state. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 7:14 am
   The program was also designed to reflect that, including songs of the peace-protest movement and songs mourning the losses incident to the continuing state of warfare. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm by Josh Blackman
Today, the Supreme Court issued an order on the emergency docket in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 7:40 pm by Liam Thornton
Related PostsJuly 1, 2010 -- The De Facto Same Sex Family and Irish Law (6)June 25, 2010 -- LGBT Pride: 2009-2010 in Review (2) [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
  The United States, as incarnated in its Chief Executive and as articulated in his State of the Union, suggests this process of aging. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 3:51 pm
Carter has granted the federal government's motion to dismiss the pending lawsuit of Smelt v. [read post]