Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 201 - 220
of 13,687
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2024, 12:23 am
No right to assisted dying under the ECHR In the case of Dániel Karsai v Hungary [2024] ECHR No. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:59 pm
”) In Virginia State Pharmacy Bd. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm
" But Success Kid's mom registered the copyright of the viral photo in 2012. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 1:51 am
In addition, the State is responsible for the protection of cultural and natural heritage and the harmonious development of culture in Slovenia.[17] This Article is linked to Article 73 of the Constitution, which states that everyone has a duty to protect cultural monuments. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 1:51 am
In addition, the State is responsible for the protection of cultural and natural heritage and the harmonious development of culture in Slovenia.[17] This Article is linked to Article 73 of the Constitution, which states that everyone has a duty to protect cultural monuments. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 3:43 pm
” Vidal v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 3:35 pm
” Sotomayor pointed to the confusion lower courts have had applying the similar analysis Thomas offered in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:11 am
In Thomson v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 5:45 am
In Vidal v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 8:17 am
Kennedy v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 4:57 am
The referring court was right to state that the protection under Art. 8(3) CDR does not require the design to serve an aesthetic function. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 3:44 am
Mills Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 3:31 am
Jackson Int’l Trading, 2012 TTAB LEXIS 246, at *6; Hornby v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:42 am
This analysis is consistent with recently published decisions by both the General Court and the Boards of Appeal on the topic, inter alia: mataharispaclub v EUIPO - Rouha (SpaClubMatahari), Gugler France v EUIPO - Gugler (GUGLER), R 1320/2022-4, CELESTINO, and R 470/2023-2, TOYA (fig.).Therefore, it is crucial for bad faith applicants to prioritise thorough, high-quality evidence collection for a successful case. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:36 am
Iron Balls International Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
The review decision in part stated I refer to R v Oxford CC ex p Doyle (1997) concluding that a Child Arrangement Order does not mean the Children are reasonably expected to live with both parents. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:50 pm
National Security Archive v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am
As stated by the judges’ decisions in Unwired Planet v Huawei and TCL v Ericsson, respectively: “Based on my assessment of both experts, I am sure the disagreement represents cases in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 4:20 am
If the applicant shows that he is registered as patent proprietor in the national registers of the relevant Contracting Member States (as 10x Genomics did in this case), there is a rebuttable presumption that he has standing to sue. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:05 am
State v. [read post]
