Search for: "State v. Rome"
Results 201 - 220
of 706
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2019, 6:02 am
Ermgassen & Co Ltd v Sixcap Financials Pte Ltd [2018] SGHCR 8 is the first judicial decision worldwide regarding the Hague Choice of Court Convention. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:59 am
Harris, Understanding public policy limits to the enforceability of forum selection clauses after Douez v Facebook, pp. 50-96 Abstract: This article explores the nature of public policy limits to the enforcement of forum selection clauses, recently considered by the Supreme Court of Canada in Douez v Facebook. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 6:50 am
After Rome fell, for instance, Europeans used barter as a substitute for the Roman currency people had gotten used to. [read post]
23 May 2019, 9:30 pm
Department of State and the U.S. [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:13 am
The most notable cases from national courts are Subafilms, Ltd. v MGM-Pathe Communications Co., 24 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir. 1994) (United States) and Abkco Music & Records Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 11:10 am
” This can lead to uncertainty.Although Aloys Hüttermann (Michalski Hüttermann & Partner) expressed “sympathy for the concept that if one applicant is the same, then the priority claim is not lost”, he disagreed with Tobias, stating that “it is “When in Rome, do as the Romans do. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 4:25 am
State St. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:50 am
Art. 5 (2) subpara. 2 Rome I Regulation “limits” freedom of choice in passenger contracts. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 5:54 am
As the Supreme Court’s opinion last term in Trump v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Katfriend Nicoletta Epaminonda takes a loot at the Cypriot transposition of the Trade Mark Directive 2015/2436 and reflects on what the future might hold for trade marks in this Member State. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 10:17 am
Inc and Decision 7709/19 Reti Televisive Italiane SpA v Yahoo! [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:02 am
In that circumstance, ruling in favour of the plaintiff, the Court of First Instance of Rome (Trib. of Rome 23 June 1984 in Foro.It 1985) acknowledged the undeniable right of the author under Article 20 of the Italian Copyright Act(integrity right) to oppose the circulation of those versions of the movie he did not directly take care of. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
” Alternatively, in A v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:50 am
The article commences with a short description of the New York Convention and Article V(1)(e) NYC. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 9:18 am
Regarding the conflict of law nature of Article 28 of Directive 2009/103, which regulates the Member States’ obligation to provide measures guaranteeing that the victim of a road traffic accident and the owner of the vehicle involved in that accident are protected, the CJEU states that this is not the conflict-of-law provision and that, consequently, it does not take precedence over the Rome II Regulation under Article 27 of the latter. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 4:00 pm
Singapore: Singapore is a prosperous city-state in South-East Asia located just about 80 miles from the equator. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 8:11 am
The indictment, making use of the German Code of Crimes Against International Law (Völkerstrafgesetzbuch, CCAIL), which was introduced in 2002 to bring German criminal law in line with the provisions in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), was the first major test of the principle of universal jurisdiction. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 8:11 am
The indictment, making use of the German Code of Crimes Against International Law (Völkerstrafgesetzbuch, CCAIL), which was introduced in 2002 to bring German criminal law in line with the provisions in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), was the first major test of the principle of universal jurisdiction. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 3:05 am
This means that Member States cannot go beyond that list, and something like the German provision:would not be 'saved' by the grandfather clause in Article 5(3)(o). [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 11:52 am
Coleman served as co-counsel with Thurgood Marshall in Brown v. [read post]
