Search for: "State v. S. D. M."
Results 201 - 220
of 9,611
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2019, 3:00 am
I assume that it is not a coincidence that the cert grant happened shortly after the Court's decision in Timbs v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:45 am
Cette jurisprudence a été appliquée de façon très stricte par le United States Patent and Trademark Office de telle façon qu’il est maintenant beaucoup plus difficile de breveter des méthodes diagnostiques. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:39 am
He'd remand for more factual development.As I said, Judge VanDyke has a point. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 11:49 am
And I'm infinitely positive that they do.Yet Justice Nares amends his opinion to add the following today. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 6:20 pm
Supp. 2d 452 (D. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:27 am
" So began the judgment of Lord Justice Ward in D (A Child) [2011] EWCA Civ 684.The facts: When the child L (I'm not sure why, not for the first time, the initial referring to the child in the judgment differs from the initial used in the citation) was 6 weeks old he suffered a fracture of the mid-shaft of his left humerus, fractures of his ribs on both his left and right side and a fracture of the left tibia. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:05 am
Agencia de Viagens CVC Tur Limitada, which can be found here, involved the sale of M/V Pacific, a boat once featured in The Love Boat television series. [read post]
18 May 2017, 1:22 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 10:52 am
Filburn and Katzenbach v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 1:41 pm
I'm a little surprised that this opinion is unanimous.There are three different possible interpretations of the part of the federal supplemental jurisdiction statute, 28 USC 1367(d), that says that state limitations periods are "tolled" during the pendency of a federal action (and for thirty days thereafter) if the federal court ultimately exercises its discretion to dismiss supplemental state law claims. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 8:42 pm
Remember, I'm just quoting. [read post]
20 May 2014, 10:42 am
A surveyor for neighbour D had run a line that purported to represent the boundary with the lands owned by neighbour M, and the trees were being felled by neighbour D on the basis of that survey. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:54 pm
Frank, Steven M. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:28 pm
Frank, Steven M. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 12:13 pm
State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:02 pm
Sure, you could adopt a contrary regulation, but that's up to the state. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 12:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 5:03 pm
They determined there was a need to criminalize such conduct because the `State Legislature ha[d] failed to address th[e] problem’ of `non-physical bullying behaviors transmitted by electronic means’ (Albany County Local Law No. 11 of 2010, § 1). [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 1:11 pm
Here, first, is President Obama's statement on the anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
