Search for: "State v. S. R. J." Results 201 - 220 of 9,184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2021, 2:30 am by S S
Hot on the heels of the decision in R (Imam) v London Borough of Croydon (2021) EWHC 739 (Admin) (see our note here) comes this altogether more satisfying decision, Elkundi & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Birmingham City Council (2021) EWHC 1024 (Admin), on the nature and enforceability of the duty under s. 193(2) Housing Act 1996. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:33 am by Rosalind English
R(on the application of S and KF) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWHC 1810 (Admin)- read judgment This case about prisoner’s pay provides an interesting up to date analysis of the role of the doctrine of “margin of appreciation” and its applicability in domestic courts. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
Oct. 28, 2020) (denying application to enjoin North Carolina’s State Board of Elections from extending state deadline for receipt of absentee ballots, over objections from Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch); Republican Party of Pa. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am by bhorton
Oct. 28, 2020) (denying application to enjoin North Carolina’s State Board of Elections from extending state deadline for receipt of absentee ballots, over objections from Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch); Republican Party of Pa. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:54 pm
In R(S) v Sutton, Stanley Burnton J said, at para 40: Prevention undoubtedly involves an objective test. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
The latest issue of the Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (Vol. 82, no. 2, 2022) is out. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am by Rosalind Earis, 6KBW
In addressing the very nature of human rights law, Lord Reed called with approval upon the words of Lord Cooke in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532: “The truth is, I think, that some rights are inherent and fundamental to democratic civilised society. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
He too considered Bonnard v Perryman and Reynolds v Malocco, as well as the hugely-influential decision of Clarke J in Cogley v RTE [2005] 4 IR 79, [2005] IEHC 180 (8 June 2005). [read post]