Search for: "State v. Schneider"
Results 201 - 220
of 382
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Schneider, 555 A.2d 1112, 1117 (N.J. 1989); and White v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 3:46 am
Case Name: Roden v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 3:46 am
Case Name: Roden v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:15 am
Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Kindred Nursing Centers v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:51 am
The Ontario Court of Appeal described the rationale for this in Schneider v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 10:28 pm
[i] In Jones v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 4:05 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 1:14 pm
Schneider, 228 Va. 671, 325 S.E.2d 91 (1985) (link unavailable). [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm
As previously stated, the series is the result of collaboration between myself and several IP practitioners and researchers across Africa (in alphabetical order): Caroline Wanjiru (Centre for IP and IT Law, Strathmore University, Kenya); Chinasa Uwanna and Ekene Chuks-Okeke (Banwo & Ighodalo, Nigeria); Marius Schneider and Nora Ho Tu Nam (IPvocate Africa, Mauritius); Vanessa Ferguson (Ferguson Attorneys, South Africa). [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 8:56 am
Gaver v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
State, 686 S.E.2d 483, 485-86 (Ga. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 12:00 am
In White v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 4:34 am
The "enforcement of a charging lien is founded upon the equitable notion that the proceeds of a settlement are ultimately under the control of the court, and the parties within its jurisdiction, [and the court] will see that no injustice is done to its own officers'" (Schneider, Kleinick, Weitz, Damashek & Shoot v City of New York, 302 AD2d 183, 187 [2002], quoting Rooney v Second Ave. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 4:18 am
” Writing for OneZero, Ephrat Livni looks at the implications of the court’s decision in the trademark dispute of United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:13 am
For The Washington Post, Gregory Schneider and Robert Barnes report that “[t]he legal dispute spins off into directions as unexpected as finding uranium on an old Virginia plantation”: “It pits a state’s right to regulate industry against the federal government’s power to oversee matters of national interest” and it “also hinges on trying to intuit the true motives of Virginia legislators more than 30 years ago when they enacted the… [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:29 am
Further, a legal malpractice claim cannot be stated if there is no attorney-client relationship between the parties (Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 3 [1st Dept 2009], affd 14 NY3d 874 [2010]). [read post]
22 May 2018, 1:22 pm
As to the risk of littering by recipients, that is indeed always present with flyers; but the Court has rejected this as justification for leafletting bans (see Schneider v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:14 am
As it happens, a week before the Florida court decision, an Illinois appellate court handed down a decision in Schneider v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 11:27 am
The answer in the case of Paroline v. [read post]
