Search for: "State v. Scott" Results 201 - 220 of 5,706
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2022, 7:45 am by Lawrence Solum
Jonathan Cervas (Carnegie Mellon University), Bernard Grofman (University of California, Irvine), & Scott Matsuda (New York Law School) have posted The Role Of State Courts In Constraining Partisan Gerrymandering In Congressional Elections on SSRN. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:38 pm by Howard Wasserman
Reorienting diversity jurisdiction around racial bias (regardless of in- or out-of-state) offers a strong new argument against the complete-diversity requirement, as illustrated by New York Times v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 1:55 am by Darryl Hutcheson, Matrix
The majority contrasted the case at hand with ECHR cases such as Üner v Netherlands and X v Austria where the ECHR had considered the best interests of the child in determining the proportionality of an interference with parents’ rights under article 8 alone and article 8 combined with article 14. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:31 pm by Jon Levitan
Also at NPR, Scott Horsely reports on Korematsu v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 6:18 am by mtlawlibrary
Alborn DA 19-0521 2020 MT 179 Civil – Other State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:13 am
By Scott Bauer - This image was released by the Agricultural Research Service, the research agency of the United States Department of Agriculture, with the ID k7245-1 (next)., Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php? [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 11:16 am
"He then hired his current attorney, Scott Yu": The U.S. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:06 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927) as one of the five worst [the others being: Dred Scott v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 2:11 pm by Scott W Lawrence
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON No. 81279-9 (consolidated) CITY OF SEATTLE v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
New from Wesleyan University Press: Prudence Crandall’s Legacy: The Fight for Equality in the 1830s, Dred Scott, and Brown v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:10 am
Indeed, the court was unanimous that the plurality opinion of Justice Edward Douglass White in Downes is still the dominant interpretation of the Constitution's Territorial Clause, abandoning the rule set forth in Dred Scott v. [read post]