Search for: "State v. Selle" Results 201 - 220 of 14,281
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2013, 2:11 am by Peter Mahler
One tailored to the particular case must be found, and that can be done only after a discriminating consideration of all information bearing upon an enlightened prediction of the future’ ” (Amodio v Amodio, 70 NY2d 5, 7, quoting Snyder’s Estate v United States, 285 F2d 857, 861). [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:41 pm by Heidi Meinzer
  For a wonderful analysis of what the Court did and did not do in Stevens, be sure to catch Matthew Liebman’s post on the Animal Legal Defense Fund Blog, Clarifying the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
Affirming a lower court’s dismissal of claims brought by a California legal technology company against its Japanese competitor over a $130 million investment round, the Ninth Circuit held that selling company equity shares does not qualify as selling goods or services under the Lanham Act (LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, PC v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:40 am
The suit has now been removed to federal court (TIPA v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 12:51 pm by Walter Calvert and Tammara Langlieb
Venable clients that engage in selling goods and/or services over the internet should evaluate whether the recent Supreme Court decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 8:42 am by The Federalist Society
This case involves the Fair Housing Act, which states that it is illegal to "refuse to sell or rent...or to refuse to negotiate for the sale or rental of, or otherwise make unavailable or deny, a dwelling to any person because of race. [read post]
18 May 2015, 2:04 pm by Steven Wildberger
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Monday in Henderson v. [read post]