Search for: "State v. Sterling" Results 201 - 220 of 599
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2017, 3:09 am by John Jenkins
Now this Shearman & Sterling blog reports that the Acting Solicitor General is asking the US Supreme Court to review whether state courts still have jurisdiction over these suits: On May 23, 2017, the Acting Solicitor General filed a brief on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae urging the Supreme Court to grant the petition for a writ of certiorari in Cyan v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 9:17 am by Steven M. Gursten
We have offices in Farmington Hills, Detroit, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Sterling Heights to better serve you. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 10:48 am by Eugene Volokh
Defendant Republican State Leadership Committee–Judicial Fairness Initiative ("RSLC–JFI") is an independent expenditure committee that opposes Goodson and supports Sterling. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 12:35 am
Sterling Mets LP WESTCHESTER COUNTYCivil PracticeFather Is Found Guilty of Civil Contempt For Violating Orders to Show Cause Tedesco v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 12:47 pm
(Clare O’Brien, Tania Mattei, and Naveen Thomas,  Sovereign Wealth Funds:  Evolving Perceptions and Strategies, Bloomberg Law (Sherman and Sterling, 2012)). [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
The latest example is Yale Divinity School (YDS) Dean Gregory Sterling, who issued a statement not only opposing the recent Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 9:52 am by Steven M. Gursten
We have offices in Farmington Hills, Detroit, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Sterling Heights to better serve you. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 10:45 am
The ACLU of Ohio challenged a set of protest restrictions passed by the city of Cleveland in Trump et al v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 2:17 pm by Steven M. Gursten
We have offices in Farmington Hills, Detroit, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Sterling Heights to better serve you. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To establish that they were intended third-party beneficiaries, plaintiffs must establish “(1) the existence of a valid and binding contract between other parties, (2) that the contract was intended for his/her benefit and (3) that the benefit to him/her is sufficiently immediate, rather than incidental, to indicate the assumption by the contracting parties of a duty to compensate him if the benefit is lost” (State of California… [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Circuit sitting en banc in 1979 on the political question issue in Goldwater v. [read post]