Search for: "State v. Trader"
Results 201 - 220
of 853
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2018, 6:21 am
An April 2016 decision by the federal appeals court in Chicago in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
Swap the non-distinctive words and add a house mark: not enough to avoid conflictWEALTHSMART v UBS SMARTWEALTH O/094/18 UK opposition (February 2018)For those involved in brand clearance, this is an illustration of the state of the Thomson Life principle in action before the UKIPO. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:30 am
Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:48 pm
In the seminal prime bank case SEC v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am
McGregor, a combination b/t traders from which someone was excluded. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:24 pm
Supreme Court in the case United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 3:49 am
In 2006, Peter left Piccinini to pursue a day-trader career and sold his shares to brothers Paul and Richard, making them 50/50 owners. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:50 pm
The case is Severstal v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
People of the State of California v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 7:27 am
Relying on the Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
In the case of Wylam v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 4:02 am
Topsteptrader, LLC v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 1:52 pm
” This is a defence that allows traders to describe the characteristics of their products or services such as used in the case of Gerolsteiner Brunnen GmbH & Co v Putsch GmbH where the Court considered the trade name ‘Kerry Spring’ which was intended to identify the geographical location of the water. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 3:29 am
DOES 1-100, Defendants (Class Action Complaint, :18-CV-01754, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois / March 9, 2018)http://brokeandbroker.com/PDF/AtlanticTradingCmpltNDIL.pdfcites alleged manipulation by traders of the final settlement price of VIX futures and options. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 2:45 pm
The petition of the day is: Coscia v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 7:52 am
Investors, however, alleged that Barclays allowed predatory high-frequency traders to operate within LX and even gave them information that was not available to other traders. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:15 am
The effect of the CJEU's decision was that claimants can potentially obtain pan-EU relief against multiple connected defendants located in different Member States, provided that there is an 'anchor' defendant sued in its Member State of domicile.The complexities of the jurisdiction issues raised in Nintendo have been further highlighted in a recent reference by the Court of Appeal to the CJEU in AMS Neve Ltd & Ors v Heritage Audio S.L. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 2:41 pm
Visalia Retail, L.P. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm
Some 40 or so years later, Chairman Clayton’s regeneration of Judge Sporkin’s gatekeeper liability lays the regulatory foundation for a successful and vast SEC ICO assault, which will leave some ICO lawyers looking over their shoulders, and others perhaps dashing for cover. 1970s: SEC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 12:45 pm
Agents of the state asked my name. [read post]
