Search for: "State v. Wear"
Results 201 - 220
of 4,715
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2013, 11:16 am
The defendant wanted his conviction reversed on this basis.There's a Texas state court case that reversed a conviction when a witness was allowed to wear dark sunglasses, a baseball cap pulled down over his forehead, and a jacket with an upturned collar. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 11:42 am
From BNA.com: Today, in Carey v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 10:19 am
At issue in United States ex rel Fair Laboratory Practices Associates v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 8:17 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 8:32 am
Wilson, citing at length their contention that the record-high level of incarceration in the United States has been beneficial. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
” Facts of Tinker v Des Moines Three public school students in Des Moines, Iowa, were suspended from school for wearing black armbands to protest the Government’s policy in Vietnam. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 4:03 am
Anthony Wasylina v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:11 am
In so doing, the court admitting that it was disagreeing with another federal district court in that state, Cordy v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:24 pm
USA Today has an article on how states are increasingly requiring rear seat passengers to wear seat belts. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 6:28 am
Supreme Court denied review in Charter Day School, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 12:30 pm
Jan. 29, 2008).Maybe AT&T should have been wearing boxing Shorts for this fight. [read post]
2 May 2015, 7:42 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
She stated that these discriminatory policies were also in violation of article 14 of the Convention. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Hak v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 8:44 am
Wearing costumes is constitutionally protected, as the Supreme Court held in Schacht v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 6:43 am
The case is Demetriou v. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 1:55 am
The Court of Special Appeals found the guilty verdicts inconsistent with the acquittal for wearing, carrying or transporting a handgun because Williams could not have used the handgun if he did not first possess it. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 4:05 am
In Nichol v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 11:06 am
For example, in Cohen v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Holt v. [read post]
