Search for: "State v. Windsor"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,332
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2014, 8:45 pm
Today, the IRS issued Notice 2014-19, which provides guidance on how qualified retirement plans should treat the marriages of same-sex couples following the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 5:44 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 2:06 pm
Windsor and District Housing Association v Hewitt (2011) CA (Civ Div) 19/05/2011 [On Lawtel and in a note from Tanfield Chambers.] [read post]
31 May 2011, 2:06 pm
Windsor and District Housing Association v Hewitt (2011) CA (Civ Div) 19/05/2011 [On Lawtel and in a note from Tanfield Chambers.] [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:41 pm
Windsor, Sekhar v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 12:58 pm
Windsor) are available here. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
The memo, which cites the decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:16 am
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 8:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:54 am
It begins: Last June, the headlines said that the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
Perry and in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 4:10 am
Relying on language in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:25 am
Those cases, Windsor v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:52 am
The team reports that “When the United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:53 am
Since the United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:22 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:51 am
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:25 am
The statement is in accordance with Holder's initial statement [text] that the Department of Justice (DOJ) will be extending all federal benefits to same-sex couples legally married according to state law following the decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 7:24 am
In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 12:24 pm
In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
