Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 14,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
Facts of Granholm v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:10 am
In Love v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 6:15 am
In Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:47 am
As I’ll show, United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 1:36 am
Secretary of State Antony Blinken stated “this draft legislation threatens media freedom and could undermine Poland’s strong investment climate”. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 9:04 am
Some plumber went to a Costco in your Great State to unplug a drain, poured some strong chemicals down it, and accidentally got a customer sick from the fumes. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 9:04 am
“Gibbons v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:54 am
Whether one looks to God for the glory of the Union or not, the 9th Circuit decision in Newdow v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 8:37 pm
The petition of the day is: Delaware Strong Families v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Maine, that state sovereign immunity applies in state court as well as federal courts; it takes major chutzpah to say, as the Torres dissenters say, that state sovereign immunity is super-strong--so strong as to be immune to states' consent to its congressional override by ratifying the Constitution--in state but not federal court.The Torres dissenters offer other distinctions as well--especially a tendentious reading of history… [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
In Fosbre v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:08 pm
Strong of the University of Missouri co-chaired and moderated the event. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:00 pm
In Robey v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:32 am
On May 28, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 2:11 am
Most significantly, she invoked the Supreme Court's decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:15 am
In the United States, patent prosecution practice is primarily shaped by two governing bodies: 1) the U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:30 am
Today’s appeal, R (on the application of Paul Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, asks whether the Health Act 2006 applies by necessary implication to a prison administered by the Crown. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:30 am
The case was Dearborn v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 3:13 am
Arbitrator’s award vacated after being judged to violate strong public policyNassau Co. v Sheriff’s Officers Association, Supreme Court, Nassau County, Justice Ralph P. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 6:28 am
§ 3582, or whether this Court's holding in United States v. [read post]
