Search for: "Stryker Corp" Results 201 - 220 of 360
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2012, 3:18 pm
British regulators are positive that a ban of metal-on-metal hip replacements from Johnson & Johnson and Stryker Corp. is necessary because of "unacceptably high" rates of follow-up operations. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:18 pm
British regulators are positive that a ban of metal-on-metal hip replacements from Johnson & Johnson and Stryker Corp. is necessary because of "unacceptably high" rates of follow-up operations. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 6:26 am by Cal Warriner
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) tells surgeons to stop using this metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip replacement (THR) combination - the Mitch THR cup/head (made by Finsbury Orthopedics, a division of J & J), in combination with the Stryker Corp. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 6:26 am by Cal Warriner
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) tells surgeons to stop using this metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip replacement (THR) combination - the Mitch THR cup/head (made by Finsbury Orthopedics, a division of J & J), in combination with the Stryker Corp. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 2:02 pm
Other companies that make metal-on-metal hip implants include Zimmer, Wright, Stryker, Corin and Biomet. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:47 pm by info@thomasjhenrylaw.com
Consumer advocacy group Public Citizen is blasting the FDA for not pulling Stryker Corp. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 10:45 am by WSLL
Jones, Fraser Stryker PC, Omaha, Nebraska. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:09 pm
Stryker Corp. et al., Alton Bass sued several related Stryker entities, alleging that he was injured by a malfunctioning Stryker hip implant. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 12:21 pm by Bexis
Stryker Corp., No. 11-10076, slip op. (5th Cir Jan. 31, 2012), that provides a pretty decent rundown of what a plaintiff has to have to plead, under TwIqbal, an unpreempted "parallel violation" claim of the manufacturing defect variety.Here are the elements that must be pleaded under Bass (which the court held that the plaintiff did):(1) The particular product that the plaintiff claims caused injury ("he received a Shell implant");(2) The nature of the claimed… [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 9:24 pm by Ben Vernia
No CIA has been imposed, but the plea agreement states that the company, a subsidiary of Stryker Corp., did not engage in sales and marketing and no longer had a marketable product. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
Stryker Corp., 2012 WL 33360, at *5 n.6 (D. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 9:21 am
., a leading maker of bone-related medical devices, accused Stryker Corp. in a federal lawsuit of raiding its San Francisco sales force and using confidential information from former employees.Stryker seeks to obtain “an improper competitive advantage” in the industry for medical implants and instruments used in spinal surgery, Synthes USA Sales LLC said in the complaint filed today in federal court in Philadelphia. [read post]