Search for: "Styles v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 5,587
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2023, 5:53 am
"[L]exicographers and the authors of English style guides have long changed practices to reflect the evolution of the English lexicon. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:09 am
As I previously noted in People v Gobrick, 510 Mich 1029, 1029 (2022) (WELCH, J., concurring), “lexicographers and the authors of English style guides have long changed practices to reflect the evolution of the English lexicon. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The book is consistently gentle in style, even as it pulls no substantive punches. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 3:43 am
It is also questionable whether the Court was correct in stating that consumer perception will only be relevant in certain circumstances, when the CJEU stated at least twice in Louboutin (at least in the English translation – see paras 43 and 48) that it was ‘necessary’, in order to determine whether a marketplace operator makes ‘use’ of a sign, to assess consumer perception. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 10:34 am
The Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am
Here’s the Wall Street Journal under the demure title, “U.S. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Part 1 of this piece can be found here. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:52 pm
""[I]t is hardly novel to say that a company that operated from California for years availed itself of that state’s privileges and directed its activities there. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 6:41 am
This is addressed in a 1995, Texas Supreme Court opinion styled, State Farm Life Ins. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 6:42 pm
The court also referred to the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Henry Schein, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 7:13 am
United States (1908) and Indian trust doctrine under United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 6:57 am
SME Steel Contractors, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 1:05 am
Article 3 states that an SPC shall be granted with respect to a product if the product is (a) protected by a patent, and (b) the subject of a granted marketing authorisation. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 6:53 am
The opinion is styled, Deepa Krishna v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 1:32 am
If they proposed some Huawei v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 1:34 pm
See Locke v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 10:57 am
Oracle America and Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 6:27 am
This case involves the interpretation of a little-known federal statute intended to protect public artistic endeavors.The case is Kerson v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:06 am
” Funk also did some fight choreography for “Rocky V. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs; Pennsylvania State University | 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) || lcb11@psu.edu First I want to thank Marcelo Thompson, Han Zhu, and Dean Fu Hualing, and all those who organized this workshop. [read post]
