Search for: "Sullivan v. Price" Results 201 - 220 of 286
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The Third Circuit, sitting en banc, heard oral argument last Tuesday, February 23, 2011, in Sullivan v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 1:04 pm
According to Danny Sullivan, both Google and Bing agree that this replication of search results can occur in instances of weak signals.According to Sullivan, Google's test proves that the surfstream is a weak signal because even where Google was providing the sole signal or sole data for the nonsensical terms, Bing used this signal (data) only about 9% of the time. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 4:04 am by Walter Olson
Notables including Alan Morrison, Richard Epstein, Kathleen Sullivan sign amicus brief urging court review of multistate tobacco settlement [Daniel Fisher/Forbes, Christine Hall/CEI, Todd Zywicki] “Congress rediscovers the Constitution” [Roger Pilon, WSJ] Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. profiled [Roger Parloff, Fortune] When outside investors stake divorce litigants: yes, there are legal ethics angles [Christine Hurt] Mexico, long noted for strict gun control laws, has only… [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
R (Guardian News and Media) v City of Westminster Magistrates [2010] EWHC 3376 (Admin) – 21 December 2010, Admin Court (Sullivan LJ and Silber J). [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 7:58 am by Todd Zywicki
 We argue in the brief that even if a state can be permitted to enact anticompetitive laws under Parker v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 12:37 am by Kelly
General Global pharmaceutical linkage regulations: A consortium framework (IP Osgoode) Pfizer rolling out generics to grab off-patent market (GenericsWeb) Australia: Too little too late: CSL Limited v Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd (No 2) and the judicial discretion to amend a patent (IP Whiteboard) Brazil: You lost your chance! [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  See this blog post for a discussion of the original three-judge panel decision from July, Sullivan v. [read post]