Search for: "Sullivan v. State Bar" Results 201 - 220 of 488
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
Sullivan that he criticized last year. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 8:04 am
The majority opinion states in part that:A recent development suggests that the Supreme Court of the United States may soon revisit and address the application of the Eighth Amendment to claims that mental illness bars execution. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:02 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
It cites cases including New York Times Co. v Sullivan, which states that “The right of citizens to inquire, to speak and to use information to reach consensus is a precondition to enlightened self-government and a necessary means to protect it. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 10:34 am
The act does not bar suits based on this sort of claim. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 7:36 am by Susan Brenner
Nonetheless, later that evening, [he] drove . . . over the state line to the Slab House bar in Mississippi. . . . [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm by Jason Mazzone
Maples asks the Supreme Court for a ruling that the state timing rule is not consistently applied and therefore is not adequate to procedurally bar his habeas petition. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 6:32 am
A few states limit or bar the division of military pensions under certain circumstances. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Sullivan, 559 N.W.2d 740, 747 (Neb. 1997) (dictum), followed in Nolan v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:48 am by Jeremy
It dives into the history of the 1909 Copyright Act and the resulting Herbert v Shanley Co. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 11:01 am by Howard Knopf
Sullivan decision, which often makes libel actions by public figures much less likely to succeed in the USA than the UK, there has been a great increase of “libel tourism” in the UK courts - much to the delight of the UK defamation bar, one can assume.George Lucas may have just brought about a similar result, even if for rather different reasons, for UK copyright lawyers. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:05 pm
The Cassinelli Appellate Court then went on to renounce constructive /resulting trust as to other assets held by the (former) service member spouse as available remedies as well, reasoning that would violate federal law and the holding of Mansell v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 10:30 am by Lisa McElroy
One more case of note this week:  Sullivan v. [read post]